3) They found a written book in Jerusalem from the time of Rabbi Akiva, "Kav and Naki" [Gittin (67a) Rashi explains that the law follows him always; Eruvin (36b), Yevamot (37b) in the name of Rashi, and there (49a, 1) Bekhorot (23b). And it is written in the book "Magen Shlomo," at the beginning of the tractate Pesachim, from the time of Rabbi Akiva, "Kav and Naki," even against the majority, as it is stated in Yevamot (37a), and it implies there that even against a general ruling the law is in accordance with him, etc.
And in his novellas on Yevamot, he inquired whether the law follows Rabbi Akiva even against a general Mishnah, as it is stated in the first chapter of Rosh Hashanah, Rabbi Akiva says that since two festivals have passed, he is liable, and the Rambam ruled in the fourteenth chapter of the laws of sacrificial offerings that three festivals are required. It is difficult, for we hold that the Mishnah of Rabbi Akiva, "Kav and Naki," applies even in a Beraita, as it is stated in Yevamot (1a), and perhaps against a general Mishnah we do not say this.
And see the Sefer Mitzvot Gadol, negative commandment 31, thus far. And see the responsa of the Pnei Moshe, part 2, section 119 regarding Rabbi Akiva, why at times the law does not follow him. And in the responsa of Chacham Tzvi, section 10, the rule that the law does not follow a student against his teacher is better than the rule of the Mishnah of Rabbi Akiva, "Kav and Naki," for this rule applies to all students against their teacher, and Rabbi Akiva was a student of Rabbi Eliezer.
And in the "She'arit Yosef" (39a) it is written in the name of the Rosh, in the chapter "One Who Was Taken Out," and in "Kol Ma'arvin," and in the gloss to the book "Kritot," and in the Mordechai in the chapter "One Who Was Taken Out," that in 112 places we rule like Rabbi Akiva, and it is difficult for him from the Gemara in Yevamot mentioned above (see there). And in the Ran on the first chapter of Shevuot, it is specifically against an individual.
And in Tosafot Nedarim (23b), if you say that the Rabbis argue with Rabbi Akiva, the law follows them, etc., for sometimes we rule not like him, and it is possible that the Rambam holds likewise, and the wonder of the Tosefot in Kilayim (2:9 and 4:8) is resolved, and see Tosefot Eruvin (8:10) (and in Tosafot there) and the Rosh in the laws of small items, section impurity, does not hold this, only it does not matter. And see the Rosh in the third chapter of Nedarim, that is to say, the Rabbi does not hold this rule at all.
And behold, it is not specifically the Mishnah of Rabbi Akiva, "Kav and Naki," it is the same when mentioned in a Beraita, and this is proven in Tosafot Kiddushin (62b, section 2) that although we hold that the law follows Rabbi Akiva in general, "Kav and Naki" is here not the law according to him, nor according to all the Tanaim who say a person acquires that which is not his, for Rav Nachman holds that a person does not acquire that which is not his, and the law follows Rav Nachman in legal matters, thus far. (And see above that the rule of the Mishnah of Rabbi Akiva, "Kav and Naki," if it overrides the rule, etc.), and behold what Rabbi Akiva said that a person acquires this is not a Mishnah but a Beraita, and they said the Mishnah of Rabbi Akiva, "Kav and Naki," and if it is true that in a Beraita this rule does not apply without the fact that the law follows Rabbi Nachman in legal matters, then it is certainly that what is said in the Mishnah of Rabbi Akiva also means a Beraita, and it is proven from its place, for Shimon ben Azai who found written the Mishnah of Rabbi Akiva, "Kav and Naki," was long before Rabbi arranged the Mishnah, and also before Rabbi arranged the Mishnah there was also an order of Mishnah as it is stated in Chagigah, Rabbi Yehuda ben Taima and his friends would teach, "Our Rabbis taught the orders of Mishnah," and Rabbi Yossi, the teacher of Rabbi, said at the end of Keilim, "Fortunate are the vessels that entered in impurity and exited in purity," and it is clear that Rabbi added and subtracted, and since the Mishnah of Rabbi Akiva, "Kav and Naki," was found before Rabbi arranged the Mishnah, it does not refer to the Mishnahs that Rabbi arranged (there, responsa of Chacham Tzvi). And so it is explicitly stated in Bava Batra (138a) in the Roshbam.
And see Tosafot Ketubot (109a). And in Menachot (31b). And it is written in the responsa of Chavat Yair that one cannot say that the Mishnah is not specific, for you will not find that it is mentioned 112 times in the Mishnah, for it can be said that there were many Mishnas in the days of the Tanaim, much more than ours, as it is stated in Chagigah, thus far. And what the Rambam ruled like Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai against Rabbi Akiva (see there).
In Tosafot Gittin (52b), Aruch states that the law does not follow Rabbi Akiva even though we say the law and we hold the Mishnah of Rabbi Akiva, "Kav and Naki," that we do not learn the law from the Talmud (see there). And in the chapter "These are the Ties," the law follows Rabbi Akiva because he rules like him from the general rule that the general rule is not effective].