Rab Zavid, son of Oshaya, in the chapter of the hired worker during the time of Amimar. [Indeed, this is as it is in Yevamot (56a) and in Avodah Zarah (33b), and it seems that there is a textual error in the Gemara because in Avodah Zarah (6b) Rab Zavid taught in the house of Rabbi Oshaya, explaining the Mishnah of Rabbi Oshaya that he arranged, and there (56a) in the house of Rabbi Oshaya he also explained in the Mishnah of Rabbi Oshaya. This matter is also found in Bava Metzia (92b) in the house of Rabbi Oshaya, and in Bava Batra (95) Rab Zavid taught in the house of Rabbi Oshaya, and Bar Yitzchak, son of Oshaya, should also be in the house of Rabbi Oshaya.
And in the chapter of Shevuot (47a) Rab Zavid, son of Oshaya, also taught (I believe there is also a textual error and it should be in the house of Rabbi Oshaya). Alternatively, it could be that Rab Zavid taught and said Rabbi Oshaya. Behold, your eyes see that Rab Zavid was not the son of Rabbi Oshaya, and it is evident that he brings the lineage in the chapter of the hired worker, and there it is explicitly stated in the house of Rabbi Oshaya.
And what is said that he was during the time of Amimar, you will find only Rab Zavid, simply stated, was during the time of Amimar as mentioned above. And it is evident that you will not find in all the aforementioned places that he understood that Rab Zavid is the son of Oshaya, and how will you not find that he says in the name of an Amora or in the name of some Tanna, and it is evident that he did not say in the name of Amimar.
Rather, it is simple that this is the aforementioned Rab Zavid who taught in the name of several Amoraim, and he also taught in the name of the Mishnah of Rabbi Oshaya, and it is clear.
Furthermore, Rab Zavid from Nehardea was during the time of Amimar and is not the simple Rab Zavid.
Seder_HaDorot,_Tanaim_and_Amoraim.1074:1